That Time the NSA and DHS Came After Me for Jokes and I Won

For over two decades, I've been the occasional parodist, which is the weird name we have for a person who does parodies. What's a parody? Well, in short, it's a kind of joke. But it's kind of like when a comedian does an impression. They're pretending to be someone else for comedic effect. Usually exaggerating and changing things a little bit.

Parodies are "protected speech" in the United States. That means the government isn't supposed to be able to stop you from saying something. It's protected by the Constitution. The legal definition of a parody is "a form of speech protected by the First Amendment as a "distorted imitation" of an original work for the purpose of commenting on it."

My work has always focused on people with more power than sense, so inevitably my portfolio is filled with government and politicians. Sometimes those gags are parodies.

In June of 2013, Edward Snowden made news for leaking an incredible quantity of National Security Documents that showed evidence of what many considered not only unethical but unconstitutional behavior. Like other parodists, comedians, humorists, and political cartoonists at the time I was pretty floored. Maybe not surprised because it wasn't the first time we learned that the agency was horsing around with civil liberties. But taken aback at the scope of what I saw.

So off to work I went making a few new jokes and parodies about the situation. I had been doing jabs at the NSA for years, but now I had new material! In fact, the very day the news hit I came up with a line I thought was pretty clever. 

"The NSA: The only part of government that actually listens."

Ha! That was it.

Now I'll just do the old parody trick of tweaking their official symbol a bit. Luckily for me, Snoop Dog had recently been on my playlist. I must have been reliving my high school days or something. But it came to me... "Peeping while you're sleeping."

"That's the one, Snoop." I thought.  "That's the one, dog."

So, I set up my artwork for print, made my tweaks, shot it off to be featured in my various shops and marketplaces for sale, and moved on. That was pretty much my workflow juggling various projects. After I shot off notifications to fans that was it. 

By the end of the day - hours later, actually - I was contacted by one of my marketplace partners, Zazzle. They sent a cryptic, very vague email stating that my NSA parody had to come down because "the copyright holder" made a formal complaint. 

What? Copyright holder? I'm the copyright holder! Or, no! They couldn't mean the NSA? Could they? 

They did.

I had been with Zazzle since they were a scrappy Silicon Valley startup. I was awkwardly their very first “Pro Seller” who signed with them as the an independent brand 6 years earlier. It caused a bit of a ruckus in the industry at the time, setting off a sort of arms race between platforms that offer such services. We had a good relationship. That meant the strange, evasive communications with them were unsettling. Creepy even. It was obvious their legal counsel was telling the company to say nothing more. 

After a nauseating back and forth between the company and my attorney, the great Paul Alan Levy, we finally realized that the NSA was trying to put the kibosh on all of my NSA parodies through a cease and desist!

Worse yet, the Department of Homeland Security had also issued a cease and desist for my "Homeland Stupidity Department" parodies. What was going on? 

It took some serious lawyering to uncover the problem. But Mr. Levy found out that the NSA's argument for censoring the work was based on a little-known law enacted in the 1950s - Public Law 86-36 - when the agency was created. We're talking Eisenhower Administration here. It stated that any use of the letters NSA, or reference to the agency must be approved personally by the director of the NSA.

Apparently, the NSA was arguing that the parody illegally used their logo and the letters NSA, and they were threatening stiff legal action if I didn't comply with their takedown.

The upshot was clear to me. The NSA believed that this Public Law 86-36 superseded the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. 

Sorry, Feds. I don't think so. 

I didn't comply.

Instead, I decided to fight them in court. I filed to sue in 2013 on 1st Amendment grounds, and then when the story started to break in the press all hell broke loose. 

Get the shirt that beat the NSA.