Apparel
  • Accessories

  • Home
  • Browse Categories
  • Stickers
  • Little sticky memes you can post in real life.

  • Add description, images, menus and links to your mega menu

  • A column with no settings can be used as a spacer

  • Link to your collections, sales and even external links

  • Add up to five columns

  • Lysander Spooner: The Principled Radical Who Declared War on the Mail Monopoly

    Lysander Spooner was the sort of man who’d get kicked out of heaven for smuggling in contraband just to challenge divine authority. He was born in Athol, Massachusetts, but spiritually he belonged to that dark corner of the American psyche where liberty gets mean, civil disobedience grows fangs, and the Constitution isn’t holy writ—it’s kindling.

    If the United States had a rogue’s gallery for philosophical saboteurs, Spooner would be etched in stained glass, arms crossed, glaring at the clerks tallying postage.

    The Soil He Sprang From

    Spooner’s pedigree was textbook Yankee—Mayflower blood, Congregationalist austerity, farming family, the whole nine yards of puritanical stock. But young Lysander had something in him that didn’t quite stick to the New England moral code. He didn’t bow. He didn’t ask for permission. And he didn’t think the state was a benevolent father figure. He thought it was a thug in a powdered wig.

    When Massachusetts required an accredited legal education to practice law, Spooner skipped the ivory tower and hung out a shingle anyway. He called licensing laws a racket and refused to play the game. This wasn’t rebellion for rebellion’s sake. It was the blueprint of a worldview: that government’s authority only exists to the extent you consent to it—and Spooner didn’t.

    The Letter That Launched a War

    In the 1840s, the U.S. Post Office was what you’d expect from a federally protected monopoly: slow, overpriced, and smug about it. Mailing a letter from Boston to D.C. could run you 25 cents—a quarter of a working man's daily wage, and about as painful as a stubbed toe in a freezing outhouse. Enter Spooner, smelling blood and bullshit. He launched the American Letter Mail Company in 1844, cutting prices by more than half in some cases and delivering faster than the bureaucrats could shuffle their ink-stained fingers across a ledger.

    Spooner set up shop like a man opening a speakeasy next to the IRS. He minted stamps with all the subtlety of a raised middle finger, stacked his routes along major railways, and staffed them with couriers who moved letters like they were smuggling contraband truth. His offices sprouted up in big cities like weeds in a federal garden, and every envelope he delivered carried the scent of revolution. When the government realized Spooner was outflanking them, it lashed out with lawsuits and intimidation. But the spell had already broken. Citizens had tasted cheaper, faster, private mail—and suddenly the Post Office didn’t seem so sacred. The government slashed rates to survive, birthing the 3-cent stamp as a desperate concession to free-market reality. Spooner’s rogue campaign rewrote the rules.

    Washington went nuclear. Laws were rewritten. Railroad companies were strong-armed into cutting off service. Legal victories became harder to come by, as the law tilted quietly in favor of the monopoly it was meant to restrain. By 1851, the feds crushed Spooner’s operation by brute legal force. But they couldn’t erase the mark. Postage prices fell permanently. The 3-cent stamp was born. And somewhere, Spooner was lighting a cigar with a cease-and-desist order.

    A Mind Too Sharp for the Century

    Spooner didn’t belong to his time, and that was precisely the problem. He floated like a wasp through the 19th century, too radical for the Republicans, too principled for the utopians, too capitalist for the communists, and too moral for the nihilists.

    The intellectual air he breathed came from the natural law tradition—John Locke with brass knuckles. But where Locke wrote about life, liberty, and property as polite theory, Spooner strapped those concepts to a battering ram and started aiming at institutions.

    The backdrop was wild: Thoreau was writing about civil disobedience, the Second Great Awakening was convulsing the country into evangelical fervor, and radicalism was finding new homes in abolitionist circles and anarchist journals. Spooner waded into all of it with pamphlets blazing. His Unconstitutionality of Slavery (1845) twisted the Constitution into a dagger pointed at the throat of slavery, arguing that any law protecting bondage was not just immoral, but unlawful. Frederick Douglass read it and changed his mind. Mississippi Senators read it and saw red.

    He didn’t stop there. Spooner promoted jury nullification like it was a citizen’s sacred duty. He offered legal aid to runaway slaves. He advocated for violent insurrection to destroy slavery, then turned around and opposed Lincoln’s war to preserve the Union, because he saw it as state aggression by another name.

    In a world obsessed with sides, Spooner refused to pick one. He picked principles, and if they led him into the wilderness, so be it. 

    Spooner’s Gospel of Hell-No

    By the time the war ended and the republic limped toward Reconstruction, Spooner had sharpened his teeth into pure philosophical weaponry. His magnum opus, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, read like the Book of Revelation rewritten by a legal assassin. His argument? The Constitution has no binding power on anyone who hasn’t explicitly agreed to it. Which is, you know, basically everyone.

    He likened voting to a survival strategy in a hostage situation. Obedience wasn’t morality—it was compliance under duress. The state had no right to rule you. Period. End of file.

    He railed against wage slavery, corporate monopolies, and state currency. He promoted private money, cooperative labor, and voluntary association decades before these concepts gained widespread recognition. He wanted a society where free people dealt with each other like adults and left rulers to rot in irrelevance.

    And he never let up. Into his seventies, Spooner kept writing, publishing, and arguing like a man possessed. He died in 1887, broke but unbowed. His ideas—then fringe, now foundational for everyone from agorists to libertarians to cranky guys on YouTube—refused to die with him.

    The Mad Prophet of Liberty

    Spooner didn’t write for acceptance. He wrote because he believed every man had the right to live uncoerced. And if the cost of saying that out loud was mockery, lawsuits, and poverty—so be it. He lived it anyway.

    He made enemies of monopolists, slaveholders, statists, and warmongers. And he made allies out of anyone who ever looked at a government form and muttered, "Who the hell are you to tell me what to do?"

    He was an American original. A relic of a time when ideas were dangerous, printing presses were weapons, and some crank in Massachusetts could challenge the world with ink and gall.

    That’s why he matters. That’s why he still kicks like a mule. And that’s why every time you lick a stamp, somewhere, Spooner is smiling.

    Reviews